By the turn of the 20th century, most military forces had moved to centerfire, bolt-action rifles that were firing, what would be considered, small and fast cartridges. However, these rifles chambered centerfire cartridges that were often big, heavy, expensive, and labor-intensive to build. Further, a lot of machine work on these rifles was rudimentary, and hand-fitting was common. All these factors made them bad for training purposes. So cadet rifles came as the solution.
Cader rifles were offered as a cheaper and easier-to-produce alternative in a much cheaper caliber. Most cadet rifles mimicked the basic overall layout of the rifles of the era, however, they were chambered in .22LR which is a very small round that uses a rimfire design. These low-powered rounds are extremely cheap to produce and, even today, cost pennies.
Related: This is how you can join the Ukraine Foreign Legion (and who can join it)
At the range with a cadet rifle
Cheap rifles and cheap ammo mean that a military can inexpensively teach marksmanship skills to new shooters. It is also easier to train a new shooter with a round like .22LR. At the range, this cartridge has much less recoil than a full-powered rifle cartridge, it’s also substantially quieter. New shooters could focus on firearm safety and basic marksmanship rather than concern themselves with recoil and massive booms. Instructors could more easily pass information with the report of a .22 rifle than with that of a .30 caliber battle rifle.
The US used several rifles for that purpose, most famously the M1922, which was a bolt action .22LR rifle designed to mimic the Springfield M1903 rifle. It also used bolt-action rifles from Remington, Stevens, and Winchester for marksmanship training long after the semi-auto M1 Garand had been the rifle of choice.
The Germans had a similar idea with the Mauser KKW cadet rifle, another .22LR rifle designed to mimic the Karabiner 98K. The British and Australians have one of the earlier known cadet rifles in the form of the Martini Cadet, which mimicked the Martini-Henry and used a unique .310 Cadet cartridge. America seems to have the first with the Remington M1867 in .50-45 centerfire carbine cartridge
These types of rifles taught new shooters the ins and outs of the rifle they would likely carry into combat. Yet, several cadet rifles were just used for training purposes. These rifles did not mimic a specific rifle but were issued only to teach marksmanship to troops.
Modern cadet rifles also exist and are chambered in larger calibers. The Parker-Hale M82 is used by the British to this day to teach new shooters basic marksmanship and it uses a 7.62 NATO round. Another modern cadet rifle is the L98A1 which uses a 5.56 round as well and is a single-shot mock-up of the British L85 rifle.
The downsides to cadet rifles
The main downside, especially with a rimfire variant of an actual rifle, is that the trainee still needs to learn how to handle a full-powered cartridge as the minimal recoil generated by a .22LR does not truly prepare a troop to handle a battle rifle.
Further, while cheaper in the short run, a cadet rifle still requires you to train armorers, instructors, and soldiers on a platform that won’t be sued in battle which creates additional logistical requirements. Modern manufacturing has also made it much cheaper to produce ammunition and rifles. This is largely why your modern troop is trained with the same rifle they’ll carry into combat.
Cadet rifles have largely disappeared in most military forces, but you could argue the air rifles and rimfire rifles used by NJROTC and ROTC teams are a cadet rifle’s modern incarnation.
Feature Image: Soldiers training with a cadet rifle. (Creative Commons)
Read more from Sandboxx News
- Images surface of secretive US MALD flying decoy used in Ukraine. But what is MALD?
- This is how you can join the Ukraine Foreign Legion (and who can join it)
- Fort Moore Basic Training: Developing the future force
- Army Basic Training packing list
- Breaking down the SERE school myths: How accurate are they?
Ha Angel fentanyl
In the 1990’s, I was the liaison officer with a local Army Cadet unit (13-17 year olds). At the time, the regulations had tightened up and they were restricted to “single-shot” weapons only. Usually they used Daisy air rifles with the older cadets using the Lee-Enfield with the .22 insert.
After reading all of the regulations and talking with both my CO and the Cadet CO, I developed a training exercise proposal. It would have involved about 6 guys from my unit (8th Field Engineer Regiment) training the cadets on two “single-shot” weapons.
When my proposal landed in the Cadet Headquarters, they almost crapped out a brick. My proposal was training the cadets on the M72 LAW and the 84mm Carl Gustav. Both are “single-shot” weapons. My unit had a bunch of the Sub Calibre Training Device (SCTD) rounds for the Carl G that fired a 6.5mm tracer. We would use the regulation bulls-eye target at a local range.
The officer at headquarters flat out told that me “we are not teaching 14 year olds how to destroy tanks!” What a killjoy!
Want to see a real one?
Obbligato
Everything you bring to the public is amazing. how do you You think of a lot of content. And it’s great.
Hun e didxen es o Riga to Dutchland
I’m confused. What ROTC team uses air rifles and rimfire rifles?
I don’t recall being issued anything other than M-16s and M-60s for training. (And Garands for rifle drills.)
No US commissioned officer accessions program employs cadet rifles in their training program.
I can’t speak to JROTC because I don’t speak to things I know nothing about.