Read the original article on Military.com. Follow Military.com on Twitter.
The U.S. Space Force finally has an official rank structure for its enlisted members and officers, a service spokesman has confirmed to Military.com.
A leaked memo first posted on the popular Facebook page Amn/Nco/Snco detailed the new ranks, which nearly mirror Air Force ranks.
Instead of “airman,” junior enlisted members between E-1 and E-4 will be called specialists, according to the document. The Army is the other service with a specialist rank, for troops in the E-4 paygrade.
While the Air Force has staff and technical sergeants, the Space Force E-5 rank will be known as sergeant, followed by technical sergeant for E-6. Officer ranks — second lieutenant to general — will remain the same as its sister service.
The new rank structure takes effect Feb. 1, the memo states.
The most senior member is the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, an E-9 rank, the memo adds. Chief Master Sgt. Roger Towberman, the senior enlisted adviser to the service, will officially assume that title effective next week, the spokesman said.
There will be no changes to benefits entitlements, according to the memo.
Some speculated that the Space Force, which is part of the Department of the Air Force, would adopt its parent service’s rank structure; others argued for using the Navy‘s rank system — which is what some lawmakers intended.
In July, Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, proposed an amendment in the fiscal 2021 National Defense Authorization Act requiring “the same system and rank structure as is used in the Navy” for the Space Force, according to a House summary of the text.
Space Force officials said they were ready to move forward, but because of the measure, the service halted announcing its decision at that time.
A Navy rank system would make sense for the Space Force, experts have said. Other space enthusiasts have noted on social media that “Space Admiral just sounds better.”
“A good reason to use Navy ranks in the Space Force is to better distinguish [Space Force] personnel from Air Force personnel, kind of like [the Marine Corps] using different ranks than the Navy,” Todd Harrison, director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, said in July following Crenshaw’s proposal.
But last month, lawmakers ultimately ditched Crenshaw’s provision on naval ranks.
Even William Shatner — the actor who portrayed Capt. James Kirk of the USS Enterprise in the original “Star Trek” series — initially backed Crenshaw’s idea.
In an op-ed titled, “What the heck is wrong with you, Space Force?” published in Military Times in August 2020, Shatner said there is historical precedence — in the entertainment industry, anyway — for space commanding officers to take naval ranks.
“When you unveiled the Space Force logo, many immediately saw it as an homage to ‘Star Trek’ (even though our Delta was an homage to the previous military space insignias). Why not borrow back from ‘Star Trek’ and adopt our ranks as well?” he wrote. “We took them from the Navy for good reason.”
While its rank structure seems to be set, the Space Force still lacks an official dress uniform, physical fitness uniform and mess dress uniform; an official song; patch and insignia wear.
The service has so far debuted its organizational structure; official logo, seal, flag and motto; a dark navy-colored name tape; and a lapel pin.
It has also issued guidance on how to wear the camouflage uniform. (Like the Army and Air Force, Space Force members wear the Operational Camouflage Pattern as the official service duty uniform.) And it has released three commercials to attract new recruits.
Last month, then-Vice President Mike Pence announced that space professionals would be called Guardians.
Fredrick Belcher says
Two years and no comments? I just ran across this site after having a discussion with friends on the subject.
In my opinion this Space Force creation was a complete political move, and a huge waste of money. Space Command, as a major command in the USAF, would have continued to function just as this new branch of the military is today. All that was gained was a number of additional O-6 and higher positions and probably new enlisted positions, plus some additional E-8/9 positions. Of course the president will always be known as the one who brought Space Force on board as a separate miliary branch, put the U. S. ahead of its adversaries AND allies. There is no real gain, no advantage over what we had with the former configuration.
Maury Marcus says
They could have cleaned up the verbosity in the adjectives in the Air Force name. Bureaucratic inertia nixed imagination. How about something like this:
Junior Sergeant (E-5)
Chief Sergeant (E-8)
Chief Master Sgt
Under Officer (O-1)
Vice Colonel (O-5)
Vice General (O-9)
General of Space
How could an E-1, with no training whatsoever, be a specialist? What is her|his specialty? The Army grade of Specialist (E-4) makes some sense. She|he has earned specialized knowledge and experience beyond a PFC. This makes no sense. Why did they not use Guardian for the first four grades?