World War II is largely credited with the explosive birth of modern maneuver warfare, but the conflicts between WWI and WWII largely influenced and helped develop modern squad tactics. Specifically, Marines taking the Thompson SMG to Nicaragua and beyond helped develop maneuver warfare and small-unit tactics.
The Banana Wars were a complex series of engagements where the United States attempted to quell local rebellions at the behest of American fruit companies.
The United States Marine Corps was often called in for these engagements due to its flexible design and seaborne nature. U.S. troops occupied Nicaragua from 1912 to 1933 almost continuously. Today we are going to take a look at the Marines and the Thompson SMG during the Second Nicaraguan campaign. The Thompson rose to fame during WWII, but it was in this war that it earned its stripes.
The Thompson SMG and the Second Nicaraguan campaign
When the Marines landed in Nicaragua, they carried mostly standard arms of the day. This included the Springfield M1903 bolt-action rifle, the newly minted Browning Automatic Rifle, the M1911, and a number of contemporary belt-fed machine guns.
They also landed with the Thompson SMG.
The Marines were the first armed force to adopt the Thompson SMG. They went armed with the gun at the behest of a few Marine officers, including two with the surname Cutts who would later design the Cutts compensator for the Thompson. A third officer, Victor Bleasdale, also heavily promoted the gun. He labored for the gun so hard that Chesty Puller, the legendary Marine Corps officer, once said, “the man that gave it the biggest push… was Bleasdale.”
Bleasdale also would receive a cut of the profits based on an agreement with the two Cutts. Admittedly the entire idea seemed to be a way for the Cutts and Bleasdale to make some extra cash.
While it seems that the adoption of the Thompson SMG was done under some scandalous means, it wasn’t a bad decision, as World War I showed the power of automatic fire, and handheld automatic fire could be revolutionary. And it would also prove a very influential call.
Related: The brutality of trench weapons in World War I
In the jungle, you need a jungle gun
Nicaragua was covered in thick, luscious jungle and jungle warfare tends to favor close combat.
Guns like the Springfield 1903 were great for long-range fire over open fields, but the 43.2-inch long rifle and its bolt action was a poor choice for close-quarters jungle fighting. They also suffered from a slow rate of fire, limited capacity, and length. The BAR offered full automatic firepower but was still 47 inches long and weighed nearly 20 pounds. The belt-fed machine guns of the era were heavy and hard to move from place to place and slow to set up when dealing with insurgent warfare. So something else was needed.
The Thompson SMG weighed 10 pounds and was only 33.7 inches long. For comparison, an M4 with its stock extended is 33 inches long. The Thompson also offered a firing rate of 700 rounds per minute. Its effective range was only 50 yards or so, but in jungle warfare, that proved to be enough.
Therefore, the Thompson SMG became the choice of Marines who walked point on patrol. The weapon offered a lot of firepower that allowed the Marines to suppress enemy forces and charge them.
Related: The Bushmaster carbine – Made for the jungle
The Thompson SMG changes squad tactics
The Marines figured out that a team of four men with Thompsons offered more firepower than a nine-man rifle squad. The weapon allowed Marines to lay down suppressive fire to counter and conduct ambushes. They could pursue and fight back against greater numbers of enemy forces due to their firepower.
The Thompson SMG acted almost as a proto-SAW that could keep the enemy’s head down while a rifle team maneuvered. This was a fair bit different than the WWI tactics of using heavier machine guns to support trench warfare. Thus, the Thompson SMG allowed the Marines to have maneuverable firepower and to locate, close with and destroy the enemy.
Chesty Puller and his Company M of local Guardia made constant use of the Thompson. This company was designed to pursue and punish the enemy. Their combination of Thompsons, BARs, and Springfields made them a mobile and lethal force that influenced how Marines squads and companies fought up until this point.
This helped the Marines develop small unit tactics that are still used to this day. The Small Wars of the Marine Corps and the Thompson SMG changed how squads could fight and showed the big difference a small unit can make on the battlefield.
B2B Massage says
Thanks for this.
B2b Massage says
It was a good post. That is educational.
meena Singh says
Great content like it
masssage near me says
good massage services
bangkok spa says
Lepke Buchalter says
I’m a VN vet and at times carried a Thompson. I was in a unit that allowed us to arm how we saw fit. In the jungle, short range, it’s my 1st choice. Yeah the Thompson is heavy and the ammo, too. But we didn’t carry all the gear that today’s grunts pack. It has a heavy slug that hits hard. Especially against small people. It knocks them down. You don’t fire it like they do in Hollywood. You aim, and fire shorts bursts,
I didn’t like the M-16. Everyone I knew thought the Ak-47 was a better weapon. People on point carried the Ak. In my time, without excessive maintenance, the M-16 would jam. From what I hear from newer vets, it still does. I did use the Stoner 63 rifle, and liked it much better than the M-16.
mpo slot terbaru says
Kumpulan situs daftar mpo slot gacor terbaru dan terpercaya deposit pulsa tanpa potongan 24jam
Fred the Head says
I was surprised how much the venerable Thompson SMG weighs. Most modern SMG are half the weight of the Thompson.